I strongly believe in the importance of combining the issue of collective destiny with a problem of use and uses: use of life, use of resources, use of goods, use of men and their diversity. Some commentators resort to the notion of the interregnum , borrowed from gramsci, to try to capture the contradictory characteristics of the current moment in international relations. What do you think about it? Interregnum is a word used by antonio gramsci in prison notebooks to characterize the "Suspension" of the process of overcoming capitalism that he himself, along with others, believed was inaugurated by the war and the russian revolution.
It is a period of political uncertainty, economic fluctuations that can be brutal – since the crisis factors that intervened in 2007-2008 are more present than ever – and, at times, of violence. Let's s look at the
Email Lists Database usaof donald trump: a country that is excessively armed both intervention in terms of its capacity for external, the limits of which are observed today, and of possession of weapons in the population, which translates into endemic violence but which could have more serious effects if it deepens the fracture of american society.
As a moment ago, when I was asked about democracy, I am tempted to say that we must overcome the abstract distinctions between internal situation and international relations. Which is even more true when talking about the us hegemonic power. By definition, its internal balance on the social and political plane depends directly on its ability to maintain and even continuously increase the advantages linked to domination, for example, what strikes trump at first glance is the fact that he was simultaneously promising opposite things, both internally and internationally: the closing of the borders and the restoration of us power, the rehabilitation of the working class and unlimited financial deregulation. What is also impressive at the.